Skip to main content

East Maitland vs Shortland

Property investment comparison - East Maitland, NSW 2323 vs Shortland, NSW 2307

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: East Maitland wins 5, Shortland wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricEast MaitlandShortland
Median house price$840K$840K
Median unit price$590K$720K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.07%3.99%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.96%
1-year house growth+12.6%+11.2%
3-year house growth+24.4%+23.9%
Vacancy rate1.1%1.1%
Population11,8604,537

East Maitland vs Shortland: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $840K in East Maitland and $840K in Shortland.

For units, East Maitland sits at a median of $590K against $720K in Shortland, which makes East Maitland the more affordable unit market and Shortland the pricier one.

On cash flow, East Maitland leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.07%, compared with 3.99% in Shortland, a gap of 0.08 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.6% in East Maitland and +11.2% in Shortland, so recent momentum favours East Maitland, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, East Maitland houses are +24.4% and Shortland houses +23.9%, so East Maitland has compounded faster than Shortland over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.1%.

East Maitland is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,860 against 4,537, roughly 2.6 times the size of Shortland; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: East Maitland for rental income, East Maitland for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison