Skip to main content

East Maitland vs Woodrising

Property investment comparison - East Maitland, NSW 2323 vs Woodrising, NSW 2284

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: East Maitland wins 2, Woodrising wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricEast MaitlandWoodrising
Median house price$840K$840K
Median unit price$590K$555K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.07%4.00%
Gross rental yield (units)-6.62%
1-year house growth+12.6%+13.7%estimate
3-year house growth+24.4%-
Vacancy rate1.1%1.3%
Population11,8601,176

East Maitland vs Woodrising: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $840K in East Maitland and $840K in Woodrising.

For units, East Maitland sits at a median of $590K against $555K in Woodrising, which makes Woodrising the more affordable unit market and East Maitland the pricier one.

On cash flow, East Maitland leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.07%, compared with 4.00% in Woodrising, a gap of 0.07 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.6% in East Maitland and +13.7% in Woodrising (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Woodrising, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in East Maitland and 1.3% in Woodrising, so landlords in East Maitland face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

East Maitland is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,860 against 1,176, roughly 10 times the size of Woodrising; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: East Maitland for rental income, Woodrising for recent price momentum, East Maitland for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison