East Ryde vs Stanmore
Property investment comparison - East Ryde, NSW 2113 vs Stanmore, NSW 2048
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: East Ryde wins 1, Stanmore wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | East Ryde | Stanmore |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2.6M | $2.6M |
| Median unit price | - | $980K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 2.45% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.42% | 3.50% |
| 1-year house growth | +5.7% | +5.5%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | -0.2% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.0% | 1.2% |
| Population | 2,522 | 7,619 |
East Ryde vs Stanmore: what the numbers say
The median house price is $2.6M in East Ryde and $2.6M in Stanmore, so Stanmore is the cheaper entry point.
Over the past year house prices moved +5.7% in East Ryde and +5.5% in Stanmore (an estimate), so recent momentum favours East Ryde, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Stanmore and 2.0% in East Ryde, so landlords in Stanmore face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Stanmore is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,619 against 2,522, roughly 3.0 times the size of East Ryde; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Stanmore for a lower purchase price, East Ryde for recent price momentum, Stanmore for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison