Eleebana vs Pendle Hill
Property investment comparison - Eleebana, NSW 2282 vs Pendle Hill, NSW 2145
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Eleebana wins 2, Pendle Hill wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Eleebana | Pendle Hill |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.4M | $1.4M |
| Median unit price | - | $510K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 2.60% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.20% | 5.97% |
| 1-year house growth | +14.1% | +5.5%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | +24.1% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.2% | 1.8% |
| Population | 6,460 | 7,743 |
Eleebana vs Pendle Hill: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.4M in Eleebana and $1.4M in Pendle Hill.
Over the past year house prices moved +14.1% in Eleebana and +5.5% in Pendle Hill (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Eleebana, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Eleebana and 1.8% in Pendle Hill, so landlords in Eleebana face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Pendle Hill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,743 against 6,460, larger than Eleebana; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Eleebana for recent price momentum, Eleebana for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison