Skip to main content

Ellenbrook vs Port Kennedy

Property investment comparison - Ellenbrook, WA 6069 vs Port Kennedy, WA 6172

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ellenbrook wins 3, Port Kennedy wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricEllenbrookPort Kennedy
Median house price$845K$850K
Median unit price-$640K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.66%4.13%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.85%
1-year house growth+20.1%estimate+19.2%
3-year house growth-+72.9%
Vacancy rate1.6%1.3%
Population24,66813,477

Ellenbrook vs Port Kennedy: what the numbers say

The median house price is $845K in Ellenbrook and $850K in Port Kennedy, so Ellenbrook is the cheaper entry point, with Port Kennedy houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Ellenbrook leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.66%, compared with 4.13% in Port Kennedy, a gap of 0.53 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +20.1% in Ellenbrook (an estimate) and +19.2% in Port Kennedy, so recent momentum favours Ellenbrook, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Port Kennedy and 1.6% in Ellenbrook, so landlords in Port Kennedy face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Ellenbrook is the bigger suburb, with a population of 24,668 against 13,477, larger than Port Kennedy; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Ellenbrook for rental income, Ellenbrook for a lower purchase price, Ellenbrook for recent price momentum, Port Kennedy for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison