Skip to main content

Estella vs Mudgee

Property investment comparison - Estella, NSW 2650 vs Mudgee, NSW 2850

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Estella wins 3, Mudgee wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricEstellaMudgee
Median house price$750K$750K
Median unit price-$525K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.66%4.40%
Gross rental yield (units)4.60%5.15%
1-year house growth+17.6%estimate+8.5%
3-year house growth-+5.9%
Vacancy rate0.8%2.4%
Population2,54111,457

Estella vs Mudgee: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $750K in Estella and $750K in Mudgee.

On cash flow, Estella leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.66%, compared with 4.40% in Mudgee, a gap of 0.26 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.6% in Estella (an estimate) and +8.5% in Mudgee, so recent momentum favours Estella, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Estella and 2.4% in Mudgee, so landlords in Estella face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Mudgee is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,457 against 2,541, roughly 4.5 times the size of Estella; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Estella for rental income, Estella for recent price momentum, Estella for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison