Skip to main content

Fairlight vs Roseville

Property investment comparison - Fairlight, NSW 2094 vs Roseville, NSW 2069

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Fairlight wins 4, Roseville wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricFairlightRoseville
Median house price$4.1M$4.1M
Median unit price-$990K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.35%1.90%
Gross rental yield (units)2.45%4.45%
1-year house growth+2.3%estimate+0.5%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.8%2.0%
Population6,14110,340

Fairlight vs Roseville: what the numbers say

The median house price is $4.1M in Fairlight and $4.1M in Roseville, so Fairlight is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Fairlight leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.35%, compared with 1.90% in Roseville, a gap of 0.45 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +2.3% in Fairlight (an estimate) and +0.5% in Roseville (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Fairlight, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Fairlight and 2.0% in Roseville, so landlords in Fairlight face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Roseville is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,340 against 6,141, larger than Fairlight; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Fairlight for rental income, Fairlight for a lower purchase price, Fairlight for recent price momentum, Fairlight for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison