Skip to main content

Gatton vs Gordonvale

Property investment comparison - Gatton, QLD 4343 vs Gordonvale, QLD 4865

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Gatton wins 4, Gordonvale wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGattonGordonvale
Median house price$730K$730K
Median unit price$530K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.17%4.90%
Gross rental yield (units)4.51%3.80%
1-year house growth+15.8%+14.4%
3-year house growth+73.5%+45.7%
Vacancy rate0.6%1.1%
Population7,8516,944

Gatton vs Gordonvale: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $730K in Gatton and $730K in Gordonvale.

On cash flow, Gordonvale leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.90%, compared with 4.17% in Gatton, a gap of 0.73 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +15.8% in Gatton and +14.4% in Gordonvale, so recent momentum favours Gatton, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Gatton houses are +73.5% and Gordonvale houses +45.7%, so Gatton has compounded faster than Gordonvale over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Gatton and 1.1% in Gordonvale, so landlords in Gatton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Gatton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,851 against 6,944, larger than Gordonvale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Gordonvale for rental income, Gatton for recent price momentum, Gatton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison