Skip to main content

Girards Hill vs Kooringal

Property investment comparison - Girards Hill, NSW 2480 vs Kooringal, NSW 2650

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Girards Hill wins 3, Kooringal wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGirards HillKooringal
Median house price$660K$660K
Median unit price$465K$385K
Gross rental yield (houses)-4.30%
Gross rental yield (units)5.86%5.20%
1-year house growth+15.8%estimate+13.8%
3-year house growth-+30.9%
Vacancy rate0.5%2.5%
Population1,3187,404

Girards Hill vs Kooringal: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $660K in Girards Hill and $660K in Kooringal.

For units, Girards Hill sits at a median of $465K against $385K in Kooringal, which makes Kooringal the more affordable unit market and Girards Hill the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +15.8% in Girards Hill (an estimate) and +13.8% in Kooringal, so recent momentum favours Girards Hill, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Girards Hill and 2.5% in Kooringal, so landlords in Girards Hill face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Kooringal is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,404 against 1,318, roughly 6 times the size of Girards Hill; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Girards Hill for recent price momentum, Girards Hill for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison