Skip to main content

Glenelg North vs Manningham

Property investment comparison - Glenelg North, SA 5045 vs Manningham, SA 5086

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Glenelg North wins 1, Manningham wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGlenelg NorthManningham
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price$710K-
Gross rental yield (houses)2.95%2.29%
Gross rental yield (units)4.00%-
1-year house growth+7.4%-
3-year house growth+31.4%-
Vacancy rate0.9%0.6%
Population6,5941,391

Glenelg North vs Manningham: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in Glenelg North and $1.4M in Manningham, so Manningham is the cheaper entry point, with Glenelg North houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Glenelg North leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.95%, compared with 2.29% in Manningham, a gap of 0.66 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Manningham and 0.9% in Glenelg North, so landlords in Manningham face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Glenelg North is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,594 against 1,391, roughly 4.7 times the size of Manningham; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Glenelg North for rental income, Manningham for a lower purchase price, Manningham for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison