Glenmore Park vs Murrumbateman
Property investment comparison - Glenmore Park, NSW 2745 vs Murrumbateman, NSW 2582
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Glenmore Park wins 2, Murrumbateman wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Glenmore Park | Murrumbateman |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.3M | $1.3M |
| Median unit price | $790K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.26% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.11% | 4.63% |
| 1-year house growth | +6.9%estimate | +5.6% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +10.8% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.4% | 2.8% |
| Population | 25,021 | 3,607 |
Glenmore Park vs Murrumbateman: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Glenmore Park and $1.3M in Murrumbateman.
Over the past year house prices moved +6.9% in Glenmore Park (an estimate) and +5.6% in Murrumbateman, so recent momentum favours Glenmore Park, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Glenmore Park and 2.8% in Murrumbateman, so landlords in Glenmore Park face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Glenmore Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 25,021 against 3,607, roughly 7 times the size of Murrumbateman; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Glenmore Park for recent price momentum, Glenmore Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison