Skip to main content

Gorokan vs Willmot

Property investment comparison - Gorokan, NSW 2263 vs Willmot, NSW 2770

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Gorokan wins 2, Willmot wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGorokanWillmot
Median house price$850K$850K
Median unit price$585K$460K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.72%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.55%5.48%
1-year house growth+13.1%+7.8%estimate
3-year house growth+23.2%-
Vacancy rate0.8%1.0%
Population8,6242,382

Gorokan vs Willmot: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $850K in Gorokan and $850K in Willmot.

For units, Gorokan sits at a median of $585K against $460K in Willmot, which makes Willmot the more affordable unit market and Gorokan the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +13.1% in Gorokan and +7.8% in Willmot (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Gorokan, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Gorokan and 1.0% in Willmot, so landlords in Gorokan face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Gorokan is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,624 against 2,382, roughly 3.6 times the size of Willmot; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Gorokan for recent price momentum, Gorokan for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison