Skip to main content

Grafton vs Oberon

Property investment comparison - Grafton, NSW 2460 vs Oberon, NSW 2787

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Grafton wins 5, Oberon wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGraftonOberon
Median house price$560K$560K
Median unit price$420K$445K
Gross rental yield (houses)5.11%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.06%4.70%
1-year house growth+7.2%+5.0%
3-year house growth+13.6%+13.4%
Vacancy rate0.3%1.5%
Population10,5633,319

Grafton vs Oberon: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $560K in Grafton and $560K in Oberon.

For units, Grafton sits at a median of $420K against $445K in Oberon, which makes Grafton the more affordable unit market and Oberon the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.2% in Grafton and +5.0% in Oberon, so recent momentum favours Grafton, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Grafton houses are +13.6% and Oberon houses +13.4%, so Grafton has compounded faster than Oberon over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Grafton and 1.5% in Oberon, so landlords in Grafton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Grafton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,563 against 3,319, roughly 3.2 times the size of Oberon; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Grafton for recent price momentum, Grafton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison