Grenfell vs Narrandera
Property investment comparison - Grenfell, NSW 2810 vs Narrandera, NSW 2700
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Grenfell wins 1, Narrandera wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Grenfell | Narrandera |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $405K | $410K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.21% | 5.33% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.89% | 5.00% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +10.2% |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | - | 2.1% |
| Population | 2,600 | 4,369 |
Grenfell vs Narrandera: what the numbers say
The median house price is $405K in Grenfell and $410K in Narrandera, so Grenfell is the cheaper entry point, with Narrandera houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Narrandera leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.33%, compared with 5.21% in Grenfell, a gap of 0.12 percentage points.
Narrandera is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,369 against 2,600, larger than Grenfell; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Narrandera for rental income, Grenfell for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison