Skip to main content

Gwynneville vs Oakville

Property investment comparison - Gwynneville, NSW 2500 vs Oakville, NSW 2765

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Gwynneville wins 3, Oakville wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGwynnevilleOakville
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$630K$860K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.29%
Gross rental yield (units)4.50%3.62%
1-year house growth-1.5%+6.4%estimate
3-year house growth+14.5%-
Vacancy rate0.8%5.8%
Population3,1392,027

Gwynneville vs Oakville: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Gwynneville and $1.3M in Oakville.

For units, Gwynneville sits at a median of $630K against $860K in Oakville, which makes Gwynneville the more affordable unit market and Oakville the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved -1.5% in Gwynneville and +6.4% in Oakville (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Oakville, while Gwynneville went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Gwynneville and 5.8% in Oakville, so landlords in Gwynneville face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Gwynneville is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,139 against 2,027, larger than Oakville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Oakville for recent price momentum, Gwynneville for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison