Skip to main content

Helensburgh vs Wilberforce

Property investment comparison - Helensburgh, NSW 2508 vs Wilberforce, NSW 2756

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Helensburgh wins 1, Wilberforce wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHelensburghWilberforce
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price$870K$755K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.05%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.47%4.96%
1-year house growth+9.2%+12.7%
3-year house growth+21.4%+41.1%
Vacancy rate1.0%1.2%
Population6,5762,957

Helensburgh vs Wilberforce: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.4M in Helensburgh and $1.4M in Wilberforce.

For units, Helensburgh sits at a median of $870K against $755K in Wilberforce, which makes Wilberforce the more affordable unit market and Helensburgh the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.2% in Helensburgh and +12.7% in Wilberforce, so recent momentum favours Wilberforce, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Helensburgh houses are +21.4% and Wilberforce houses +41.1%, so Wilberforce has compounded faster than Helensburgh over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Helensburgh and 1.2% in Wilberforce, so landlords in Helensburgh face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Helensburgh is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,576 against 2,957, roughly 2.2 times the size of Wilberforce; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Wilberforce for recent price momentum, Helensburgh for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison