Skip to main content

Hemmant vs Upper Coomera

Property investment comparison - Hemmant, QLD 4174 vs Upper Coomera, QLD 4209

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hemmant wins 2, Upper Coomera wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHemmantUpper Coomera
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price-$840K
Gross rental yield (houses)-4.00%
Gross rental yield (units)3.26%4.60%
1-year house growth+11.6%+16.0%
3-year house growth+42.5%+41.9%
Vacancy rate0.4%1.3%
Population2,88627,180

Hemmant vs Upper Coomera: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Hemmant and $1.1M in Upper Coomera.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.6% in Hemmant and +16.0% in Upper Coomera, so recent momentum favours Upper Coomera, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Hemmant houses are +42.5% and Upper Coomera houses +41.9%, so Hemmant has compounded faster than Upper Coomera over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Hemmant and 1.3% in Upper Coomera, so landlords in Hemmant face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Upper Coomera is the bigger suburb, with a population of 27,180 against 2,886, roughly 9 times the size of Hemmant; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Upper Coomera for recent price momentum, Hemmant for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison