Highbury vs Semaphore Park
Property investment comparison - Highbury, SA 5089 vs Semaphore Park, SA 5019
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Highbury wins 0, Semaphore Park wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Highbury | Semaphore Park |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | $1.1M |
| Median unit price | - | $755K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.20% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.20% |
| 1-year house growth | +17.4%estimate | +21.0% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +22.2% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.8% | 0.4% |
| Population | 6,956 | 4,541 |
Highbury vs Semaphore Park: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Highbury and $1.1M in Semaphore Park.
Over the past year house prices moved +17.4% in Highbury (an estimate) and +21.0% in Semaphore Park, so recent momentum favours Semaphore Park, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Semaphore Park and 1.8% in Highbury, so landlords in Semaphore Park face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Highbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,956 against 4,541, larger than Semaphore Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Semaphore Park for recent price momentum, Semaphore Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison