Skip to main content

Holmview vs Woodend

Property investment comparison - Holmview, QLD 4207 vs Woodend, QLD 4305

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Holmview wins 0, Woodend wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHolmviewWoodend
Median house price$885K$885K
Median unit price-$555K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.90%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.55%-
1-year house growth+16.5%+22.9%
3-year house growth+45.4%+60.8%
Vacancy rate1.0%0.9%
Population4,4551,483

Holmview vs Woodend: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $885K in Holmview and $885K in Woodend.

Over the past year house prices moved +16.5% in Holmview and +22.9% in Woodend, so recent momentum favours Woodend, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Holmview houses are +45.4% and Woodend houses +60.8%, so Woodend has compounded faster than Holmview over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Woodend and 1.0% in Holmview, so landlords in Woodend face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Holmview is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,455 against 1,483, roughly 3.0 times the size of Woodend; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Woodend for recent price momentum, Woodend for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison