Skip to main content

Islington vs Kalaru

Property investment comparison - Islington, NSW 2296 vs Kalaru, NSW 2550

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Islington wins 4, Kalaru wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricIslingtonKalaru
Median house price$1.0M$1.0M
Median unit price$810K$590K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.81%3.11%
Gross rental yield (units)4.40%3.34%
1-year house growth+5.8%estimate+8.9%
3-year house growth-+4.5%
Vacancy rate0.7%5.4%
Population2,026820

Islington vs Kalaru: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.0M in Islington and $1.0M in Kalaru, so Islington is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Islington sits at a median of $810K against $590K in Kalaru, which makes Kalaru the more affordable unit market and Islington the pricier one.

On cash flow, Islington leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.81%, compared with 3.11% in Kalaru, a gap of 0.70 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.8% in Islington (an estimate) and +8.9% in Kalaru, so recent momentum favours Kalaru, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Islington and 5.4% in Kalaru, so landlords in Islington face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Islington is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,026 against 820, roughly 2.5 times the size of Kalaru; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Islington for rental income, Islington for a lower purchase price, Kalaru for recent price momentum, Islington for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison