Skip to main content

Joondanna vs Riverton

Property investment comparison - Joondanna, WA 6060 vs Riverton, WA 6148

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Joondanna wins 3, Riverton wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricJoondannaRiverton
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$730K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.80%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.96%4.10%
1-year house growth+22.1%+18.8%
3-year house growth+61.2%+78.1%
Vacancy rate0.4%1.0%
Population5,2836,078

Joondanna vs Riverton: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Joondanna and $1.3M in Riverton.

Over the past year house prices moved +22.1% in Joondanna and +18.8% in Riverton, so recent momentum favours Joondanna, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Joondanna houses are +61.2% and Riverton houses +78.1%, so Riverton has compounded faster than Joondanna over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Joondanna and 1.0% in Riverton, so landlords in Joondanna face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Riverton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,078 against 5,283, larger than Joondanna; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Joondanna for recent price momentum, Joondanna for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Joondanna vs Riverton: Property Investment Comparison (2026)