Katandra vs Sale
Property investment comparison - Katandra, VIC 3634 vs Sale, VIC 3850
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Katandra wins 0, Sale wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Katandra | Sale |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $575K | $570K |
| Median unit price | - | $350K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.56% | 5.00% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 6.19% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +16.2%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 4.0% | 1.7% |
| Population | 120 | 14,296 |
Katandra vs Sale: what the numbers say
The median house price is $575K in Katandra and $570K in Sale, so Sale is the cheaper entry point, with Katandra houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Sale leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.00%, compared with 4.56% in Katandra, a gap of 0.44 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Sale and 4.0% in Katandra, so landlords in Sale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Sale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 14,296 against 120, roughly 119 times the size of Katandra; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Sale for rental income, Sale for a lower purchase price, Sale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison