Skip to main content

Kingswood vs Koolewong

Property investment comparison - Kingswood, NSW 2747 vs Koolewong, NSW 2256

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kingswood wins 3, Koolewong wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKingswoodKoolewong
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$630K$690K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.71%3.30%
Gross rental yield (units)4.35%4.27%
1-year house growth+11.1%estimate+8.8%
3-year house growth-+11.9%
Vacancy rate1.2%1.0%
Population10,633920

Kingswood vs Koolewong: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Kingswood and $1.1M in Koolewong.

For units, Kingswood sits at a median of $630K against $690K in Koolewong, which makes Kingswood the more affordable unit market and Koolewong the pricier one.

On cash flow, Koolewong leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.30%, compared with 2.71% in Kingswood, a gap of 0.59 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.1% in Kingswood (an estimate) and +8.8% in Koolewong, so recent momentum favours Kingswood, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Koolewong and 1.2% in Kingswood, so landlords in Koolewong face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Kingswood is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,633 against 920, roughly 12 times the size of Koolewong; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Koolewong for rental income, Kingswood for recent price momentum, Koolewong for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison