Kinross vs Stoneville
Property investment comparison - Kinross, WA 6028 vs Stoneville, WA 6081
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kinross wins 3, Stoneville wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Kinross | Stoneville |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.0M | $1.0M |
| Median unit price | - | $560K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.08% | 2.93% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.60% | 2.52% |
| 1-year house growth | +22.9% | +15.8%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | +60.0% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.4% | 1.4% |
| Population | 6,988 | 2,489 |
Kinross vs Stoneville: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.0M in Kinross and $1.0M in Stoneville, so Stoneville is the cheaper entry point, with Kinross houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Kinross leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.08%, compared with 2.93% in Stoneville, a gap of 1.15 percentage points.
Over the past year house prices moved +22.9% in Kinross and +15.8% in Stoneville (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Kinross, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.4%.
Kinross is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,988 against 2,489, roughly 2.8 times the size of Stoneville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Kinross for rental income, Stoneville for a lower purchase price, Kinross for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison