Skip to main content

Koolewong vs Woodburn

Property investment comparison - Koolewong, NSW 2256 vs Woodburn, NSW 2538

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Koolewong wins 4, Woodburn wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKoolewongWoodburn
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$690K$700K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.30%2.89%
Gross rental yield (units)4.27%2.48%
1-year house growth+8.8%-
3-year house growth+11.9%-
Vacancy rate1.0%0.6%
Population920817

Koolewong vs Woodburn: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Koolewong and $1.1M in Woodburn, so Koolewong is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Koolewong sits at a median of $690K against $700K in Woodburn, which makes Koolewong the more affordable unit market and Woodburn the pricier one.

On cash flow, Koolewong leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.30%, compared with 2.89% in Woodburn, a gap of 0.41 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Woodburn and 1.0% in Koolewong, so landlords in Woodburn face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Koolewong is the bigger suburb, with a population of 920 against 817, larger than Woodburn; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Koolewong for rental income, Koolewong for a lower purchase price, Woodburn for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison