Skip to main content

Labrador vs Mooloolah Valley

Property investment comparison - Labrador, QLD 4215 vs Mooloolah Valley, QLD 4553

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Labrador wins 2, Mooloolah Valley wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLabradorMooloolah Valley
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$830K-
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.37%
Gross rental yield (units)4.65%5.45%
1-year house growth+11.7%+14.9%
3-year house growth+46.8%+34.1%
Vacancy rate1.1%1.6%
Population18,6433,629

Labrador vs Mooloolah Valley: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Labrador and $1.3M in Mooloolah Valley, so Mooloolah Valley is the cheaper entry point.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.7% in Labrador and +14.9% in Mooloolah Valley, so recent momentum favours Mooloolah Valley, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Labrador houses are +46.8% and Mooloolah Valley houses +34.1%, so Labrador has compounded faster than Mooloolah Valley over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Labrador and 1.6% in Mooloolah Valley, so landlords in Labrador face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Labrador is the bigger suburb, with a population of 18,643 against 3,629, roughly 5 times the size of Mooloolah Valley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mooloolah Valley for a lower purchase price, Mooloolah Valley for recent price momentum, Labrador for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison