Skip to main content

Laguna vs Tura Beach

Property investment comparison - Laguna, NSW 2325 vs Tura Beach, NSW 2548

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Laguna wins 3, Tura Beach wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLagunaTura Beach
Median house price$960K$960K
Median unit price$465K$680K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.84%3.70%
Gross rental yield (units)5.83%4.03%
1-year house growth+4.6%estimate+2.2%
3-year house growth-+6.4%
Vacancy rate7.6%0.1%
Population3103,405

Laguna vs Tura Beach: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $960K in Laguna and $960K in Tura Beach.

For units, Laguna sits at a median of $465K against $680K in Tura Beach, which makes Laguna the more affordable unit market and Tura Beach the pricier one.

On cash flow, Tura Beach leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.70%, compared with 2.84% in Laguna, a gap of 0.86 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +4.6% in Laguna (an estimate) and +2.2% in Tura Beach, so recent momentum favours Laguna, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.1% in Tura Beach and 7.6% in Laguna, so landlords in Tura Beach face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Tura Beach is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,405 against 310, roughly 11 times the size of Laguna; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Tura Beach for rental income, Laguna for recent price momentum, Tura Beach for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison