Skip to main content

Lambton vs Lisarow

Property investment comparison - Lambton, NSW 2299 vs Lisarow, NSW 2250

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lambton wins 3, Lisarow wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLambtonLisarow
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$770K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.17%3.38%
Gross rental yield (units)3.83%4.60%
1-year house growth+9.7%+9.2%
3-year house growth+23.9%+15.1%
Vacancy rate1.1%1.2%
Population5,2145,299

Lambton vs Lisarow: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.2M in Lambton and $1.2M in Lisarow.

On cash flow, Lisarow leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.38%, compared with 3.17% in Lambton, a gap of 0.21 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.7% in Lambton and +9.2% in Lisarow, so recent momentum favours Lambton, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Lambton houses are +23.9% and Lisarow houses +15.1%, so Lambton has compounded faster than Lisarow over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Lambton and 1.2% in Lisarow, so landlords in Lambton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Lisarow is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,299 against 5,214, larger than Lambton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Lisarow for rental income, Lambton for recent price momentum, Lambton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison