Skip to main content

Leumeah vs Ruse

Property investment comparison - Leumeah, NSW 2560 vs Ruse, NSW 2560

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Leumeah wins 1, Ruse wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLeumeahRuse
Median house price$1M$1M
Median unit price$610K$425K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.44%
Gross rental yield (units)4.27%6.86%
1-year house growth+9.3%+10.2%
3-year house growth+21.7%+27.0%
Vacancy rate1.0%1.1%
Population9,9925,632

Leumeah vs Ruse: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1M in Leumeah and $1M in Ruse.

For units, Leumeah sits at a median of $610K against $425K in Ruse, which makes Ruse the more affordable unit market and Leumeah the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.3% in Leumeah and +10.2% in Ruse, so recent momentum favours Ruse, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Leumeah houses are +21.7% and Ruse houses +27.0%, so Ruse has compounded faster than Leumeah over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Leumeah and 1.1% in Ruse, so landlords in Leumeah face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Leumeah is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,992 against 5,632, larger than Ruse; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Ruse for recent price momentum, Leumeah for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison