Skip to main content

Lisarow vs Murrays Beach

Property investment comparison - Lisarow, NSW 2250 vs Murrays Beach, NSW 2281

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Lisarow wins 3, Murrays Beach wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricLisarowMurrays Beach
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price-$635K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.38%3.55%
Gross rental yield (units)4.60%4.81%
1-year house growth+9.2%+5.6%
3-year house growth+15.1%-1.4%
Vacancy rate1.2%5.5%
Population5,299882

Lisarow vs Murrays Beach: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.2M in Lisarow and $1.2M in Murrays Beach.

On cash flow, Murrays Beach leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.55%, compared with 3.38% in Lisarow, a gap of 0.17 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.2% in Lisarow and +5.6% in Murrays Beach, so recent momentum favours Lisarow, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Lisarow houses are +15.1% and Murrays Beach houses -1.4%, so Lisarow has compounded faster than Murrays Beach over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Lisarow and 5.5% in Murrays Beach, so landlords in Lisarow face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Lisarow is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,299 against 882, roughly 6 times the size of Murrays Beach; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Murrays Beach for rental income, Lisarow for recent price momentum, Lisarow for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison