Skip to main content

Mandogalup vs Marangaroo

Property investment comparison - Mandogalup, WA 6167 vs Marangaroo, WA 6064

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mandogalup wins 1, Marangaroo wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMandogalupMarangaroo
Median house price$950K$955K
Median unit price$680K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.20%4.20%
Gross rental yield (units)3.07%5.38%
1-year house growth+14.8%estimate+22.1%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.9%1.0%
Population12810,483

Mandogalup vs Marangaroo: what the numbers say

The median house price is $950K in Mandogalup and $955K in Marangaroo, so Mandogalup is the cheaper entry point, with Marangaroo houses about 1% dearer.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.20% in Mandogalup and 4.20% in Marangaroo, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.8% in Mandogalup (an estimate) and +22.1% in Marangaroo (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Marangaroo, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Marangaroo and 1.9% in Mandogalup, so landlords in Marangaroo face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Marangaroo is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,483 against 128, roughly 82 times the size of Mandogalup; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mandogalup for a lower purchase price, Marangaroo for recent price momentum, Marangaroo for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison