Mandogalup vs Mount Clarence
Property investment comparison - Mandogalup, WA 6167 vs Mount Clarence, WA 6330
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mandogalup wins 2, Mount Clarence wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Mandogalup | Mount Clarence |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $950K | $950K |
| Median unit price | $680K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.20% | 3.70% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.07% | 3.64% |
| 1-year house growth | +14.8%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | +76.5% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.9% | 3.1% |
| Population | 128 | 728 |
Mandogalup vs Mount Clarence: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $950K in Mandogalup and $950K in Mount Clarence.
On cash flow, Mandogalup leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.20%, compared with 3.70% in Mount Clarence, a gap of 0.50 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Mandogalup and 3.1% in Mount Clarence, so landlords in Mandogalup face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Mount Clarence is the bigger suburb, with a population of 728 against 128, roughly 6 times the size of Mandogalup; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Mandogalup for rental income, Mandogalup for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison