Manyana vs Pyree
Property investment comparison - Manyana, NSW 2539 vs Pyree, NSW 2540
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Manyana wins 1, Pyree wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Manyana | Pyree |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $905K | $905K |
| Median unit price | $695K | $625K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.87% | 3.97% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.06% | 4.38% |
| 1-year house growth | -2.2% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +13.4% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.7% | 2.5% |
| Population | 670 | 110 |
Manyana vs Pyree: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $905K in Manyana and $905K in Pyree.
For units, Manyana sits at a median of $695K against $625K in Pyree, which makes Pyree the more affordable unit market and Manyana the pricier one.
On cash flow, Pyree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.97%, compared with 2.87% in Manyana, a gap of 1.10 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Manyana and 2.5% in Pyree, so landlords in Manyana face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Manyana is the bigger suburb, with a population of 670 against 110, roughly 6 times the size of Pyree; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Pyree for rental income, Manyana for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison