Skip to main content

Marsfield vs Stanmore

Property investment comparison - Marsfield, NSW 2122 vs Stanmore, NSW 2048

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Marsfield wins 1, Stanmore wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMarsfieldStanmore
Median house price$2.6M$2.6M
Median unit price$1.0M$980K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.45%
Gross rental yield (units)3.63%3.50%
1-year house growth+3.8%+5.5%estimate
3-year house growth+1.7%-
Vacancy rate1.4%1.2%
Population12,4927,619

Marsfield vs Stanmore: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $2.6M in Marsfield and $2.6M in Stanmore.

For units, Marsfield sits at a median of $1.0M against $980K in Stanmore, which makes Stanmore the more affordable unit market and Marsfield the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +3.8% in Marsfield and +5.5% in Stanmore (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Stanmore, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Stanmore and 1.4% in Marsfield, so landlords in Stanmore face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Marsfield is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,492 against 7,619, larger than Stanmore; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Stanmore for recent price momentum, Stanmore for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison