Skip to main content

Mawson Lakes vs Port Adelaide

Property investment comparison - Mawson Lakes, SA 5095 vs Port Adelaide, SA 5015

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mawson Lakes wins 2, Port Adelaide wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMawson LakesPort Adelaide
Median house price$875K$870K
Median unit price$600K$700K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.90%
Gross rental yield (units)4.85%4.51%
1-year house growth+12.6%+15.3%estimate
3-year house growth+35.4%-
Vacancy rate1.1%0.6%
Population13,7941,338

Mawson Lakes vs Port Adelaide: what the numbers say

The median house price is $875K in Mawson Lakes and $870K in Port Adelaide, so Port Adelaide is the cheaper entry point, with Mawson Lakes houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Mawson Lakes sits at a median of $600K against $700K in Port Adelaide, which makes Mawson Lakes the more affordable unit market and Port Adelaide the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.6% in Mawson Lakes and +15.3% in Port Adelaide (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Port Adelaide, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Port Adelaide and 1.1% in Mawson Lakes, so landlords in Port Adelaide face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Mawson Lakes is the bigger suburb, with a population of 13,794 against 1,338, roughly 10 times the size of Port Adelaide; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Port Adelaide for a lower purchase price, Port Adelaide for recent price momentum, Port Adelaide for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison