Murrawee vs Nagambie
Property investment comparison - Murrawee, VIC 3586 vs Nagambie, VIC 3608
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Murrawee wins 1, Nagambie wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Murrawee | Nagambie |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $645K | $640K |
| Median unit price | $390K | $505K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 4.85% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | +3.3% |
| 3-year house growth | - | -8.5% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.6% | 1.6% |
| Population | 126 | 2,254 |
Murrawee vs Nagambie: what the numbers say
The median house price is $645K in Murrawee and $640K in Nagambie, so Nagambie is the cheaper entry point, with Murrawee houses about 1% dearer.
For units, Murrawee sits at a median of $390K against $505K in Nagambie, which makes Murrawee the more affordable unit market and Nagambie the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.6%.
Nagambie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,254 against 126, roughly 18 times the size of Murrawee; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Nagambie for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison