Nagambie vs The Sisters
Property investment comparison - Nagambie, VIC 3608 vs The Sisters, VIC 3265
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Nagambie wins 2, The Sisters wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Nagambie | The Sisters |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $640K | $640K |
| Median unit price | $510K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.90% | 3.78% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.98% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +3.2% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -10.1% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.4% | 3.8% |
| Population | 2,254 | 110 |
Nagambie vs The Sisters: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $640K in Nagambie and $640K in The Sisters.
On cash flow, Nagambie leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.90%, compared with 3.78% in The Sisters, a gap of 1.12 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Nagambie and 3.8% in The Sisters, so landlords in Nagambie face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Nagambie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,254 against 110, roughly 20 times the size of The Sisters; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Nagambie for rental income, Nagambie for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison