Skip to main content

Ormiston vs Salisbury East

Property investment comparison - Ormiston, QLD 4160 vs Salisbury East, QLD 4107

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ormiston wins 5, Salisbury East wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricOrmistonSalisbury East
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price$815K$1.0M
Gross rental yield (houses)3.20%2.81%
Gross rental yield (units)4.20%2.77%
1-year house growth+10.2%-
3-year house growth+27.3%-
Vacancy rate1.1%1.5%
Population6,3796,790

Ormiston vs Salisbury East: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in Ormiston and $1.4M in Salisbury East, so Ormiston is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Ormiston sits at a median of $815K against $1.0M in Salisbury East, which makes Ormiston the more affordable unit market and Salisbury East the pricier one.

On cash flow, Ormiston leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.20%, compared with 2.81% in Salisbury East, a gap of 0.39 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Ormiston and 1.5% in Salisbury East, so landlords in Ormiston face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Salisbury East is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,790 against 6,379, larger than Ormiston; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Ormiston for rental income, Ormiston for a lower purchase price, Ormiston for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison