Rubyanna vs Windaroo
Property investment comparison - Rubyanna, QLD 4670 vs Windaroo, QLD 4207
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Rubyanna wins 1, Windaroo wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Rubyanna | Windaroo |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | $1.1M |
| Median unit price | - | $745K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 1.75% | 3.80% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 3.68% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +18.8% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +41.0% |
| Vacancy rate | 3.9% | 1.6% |
| Population | 257 | 2,771 |
Rubyanna vs Windaroo: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.1M in Rubyanna and $1.1M in Windaroo, so Rubyanna is the cheaper entry point.
On cash flow, Windaroo leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.80%, compared with 1.75% in Rubyanna, a gap of 2.05 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Windaroo and 3.9% in Rubyanna, so landlords in Windaroo face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Windaroo is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,771 against 257, roughly 11 times the size of Rubyanna; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Windaroo for rental income, Rubyanna for a lower purchase price, Windaroo for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison