Sea Lake vs Tittybong
Property investment comparison - Sea Lake, VIC 3533 vs Tittybong, VIC 3542
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Sea Lake wins 2, Tittybong wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Sea Lake | Tittybong |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $250K | $270K |
| Median unit price | $385K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 7.49% | 7.07% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.05% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +12.4% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +30.7% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.5% | - |
| Population | 619 | 3 |
Sea Lake vs Tittybong: what the numbers say
The median house price is $250K in Sea Lake and $270K in Tittybong, so Sea Lake is the cheaper entry point, with Tittybong houses about 8% dearer.
On cash flow, Sea Lake leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 7.49%, compared with 7.07% in Tittybong, a gap of 0.42 percentage points.
Sea Lake is the bigger suburb, with a population of 619 against 3, roughly 206 times the size of Tittybong; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Sea Lake for rental income, Sea Lake for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison