Skip to main content

Wadalba vs Yamba

Property investment comparison - Wadalba, NSW 2259 vs Yamba, NSW 2464

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Wadalba wins 5, Yamba wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricWadalbaYamba
Median house price$980K$985K
Median unit price-$780K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.00%3.59%
Gross rental yield (units)4.43%-
1-year house growth+7.0%+4.7%
3-year house growth+13.3%+11.9%
Vacancy rate0.7%1.2%
Population4,2046,405

Wadalba vs Yamba: what the numbers say

The median house price is $980K in Wadalba and $985K in Yamba, so Wadalba is the cheaper entry point, with Yamba houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Wadalba leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.00%, compared with 3.59% in Yamba, a gap of 0.41 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.0% in Wadalba and +4.7% in Yamba, so recent momentum favours Wadalba, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Wadalba houses are +13.3% and Yamba houses +11.9%, so Wadalba has compounded faster than Yamba over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Wadalba and 1.2% in Yamba, so landlords in Wadalba face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Yamba is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,405 against 4,204, larger than Wadalba; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Wadalba for rental income, Wadalba for a lower purchase price, Wadalba for recent price momentum, Wadalba for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison