Skip to main content

Warriewood vs West Ryde

Property investment comparison - Warriewood, NSW 2102 vs West Ryde, NSW 2114

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Warriewood wins 2, West Ryde wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricWarriewoodWest Ryde
Median house price$2.5M$2.5M
Median unit price$1.5M$725K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.32%1.91%
Gross rental yield (units)3.44%-
1-year house growth+3.5%estimate+2.3%
3-year house growth-+3.3%
Vacancy rate1.6%1.0%
Population8,37913,171

Warriewood vs West Ryde: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $2.5M in Warriewood and $2.5M in West Ryde.

For units, Warriewood sits at a median of $1.5M against $725K in West Ryde, which makes West Ryde the more affordable unit market and Warriewood the pricier one.

On cash flow, Warriewood leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.32%, compared with 1.91% in West Ryde, a gap of 1.41 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +3.5% in Warriewood (an estimate) and +2.3% in West Ryde, so recent momentum favours Warriewood, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in West Ryde and 1.6% in Warriewood, so landlords in West Ryde face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

West Ryde is the bigger suburb, with a population of 13,171 against 8,379, larger than Warriewood; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Warriewood for rental income, Warriewood for recent price momentum, West Ryde for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison