Skip to main content

Does the Investment Score Predict Performance?

We measured PropRadar investment scores against actual suburb price growth and sale outcomes across the last 24 months. Here are the unfiltered results.

Top-scoring suburbs grew 5.6pp faster

Suburbs rated 65+ averaged 12.8% 1-year house price growth vs 7.2% for those rated under 44. Based on 396 high-score and 5,279 low-score suburbs with reliable growth data.

Investment score vs suburb price growth

Suburbs grouped by investment score bucket. Growth figures require high or medium confidence (minimum 10 qualifying sales).

Score rangeSuburbsAvg 1yr growthAvg 3yr growthMedian house price
65-100 (Top tier)396+12.8%+31.8%$440,000
55-64 (Strong)2,283+9.5%+30.8%$550,000
45-54 (Moderate)3,115+8.7%+27.8%$820,000
0-44 (Below average)5,279+7.2%+23.9%$910,000

Sale outcomes by investment score

Properties that sold in the last 24 months, grouped by their PropRadar investment score at the time of listing.

Score rangeSoldSold above askingAvg sold vs askingAvg days on market
65-100 (Top tier)125,12455%+1.9%37 days
55-64 (Strong)91,43038%-0.4%41 days
45-54 (Moderate)88,37133%-1.1%42 days
0-44 (Below average)123,60232%-1.6%49 days

Methodology notes

  • Growth data requires high or medium confidence rating and a minimum of 5 qualifying sales in the suburb.
  • Investment scores shown are the current scores for each suburb, not historical snapshots.
  • Sold outcomes cover properties sold in the last 24 months where asking price data was recorded at listing time.
  • This analysis does not control for property type, price tier, or location. Higher-scoring suburbs tend to cluster in metro areas with structurally higher growth.

Read the full methodology

See investment scores for any suburb

Compare scores, yield, growth, and market cycle phase across 12,000+ Australian suburbs.

View top suburbs