Vendor price cuts tripled in the three weeks after the 2026 Budget.
By budget night, investors already knew tax reform was likely. ABC reported a week earlier that negative gearing, capital gains tax and trusts were all in the package. Treasury then confirmed the tougher version on 12 May: established residential property bought after 7:30pm AEST on budget night loses the old negative-gearing treatment from 1 July 2027, while new builds keep it. The 50% CGT discount is also being replaced with indexation plus a 30% minimum tax.
The market reaction is showing up first in listings, not settled sales. Active campaigns are being repriced faster, and more new listings are going live without a public asking price.
For the full rules walkthrough with worked examples, our 2026 Budget negative gearing and CGT explainer covers the mechanics.
- Active listings logged about 370 price cuts a day from 13 May to 1 June, compared with about 130 a day in the month before budget night.
- The median cut was just under 4%. Around 35% of cuts were under 3%, 30% were between 3% and 5%, and 35% were 5% or larger.
- The "Contact Agent" share rose from 22% of new March listings to 26% in April, 36% since budget night and 41% over the most recent seven days.
- Headline asking-price medians fell by about 4% to 10% across houses, apartments and townhouses, but most of that looks like a change in what is being listed. Within price tiers, the movement is much smaller.
- The $1.2m to $2m band is worth watching: about half of post-budget listings in that range now have no public price.
- Sold prices will lag. Most sales settling now were negotiated before budget night, so late July is the earliest clean read on post-budget contracts.
How the 2026 Budget Changed Negative Gearing
Two dates matter.
The first is 7:30pm AEST on 12 May 2026. Established residential investment properties held or under contract before that time are grandfathered. Established properties bought after that point are not.
The second is 1 July 2027. From then, losses on affected established residential properties can no longer be deducted against salary and wages. They can be carried forward and used against residential property income, including future capital gains. New builds keep the old negative-gearing treatment. For CGT, the 50% discount is replaced with cost-base indexation and a 30% minimum tax on gains.
That is enough to change the maths before any sale settles. Investors may become more cautious about established properties. Some vendors may decide to bring forward a sale, while buyers may seek larger discounts to offset the less favourable tax treatment.
None of that guarantees a price fall, but it does change how much the listing data matters.
The First Signs in Australian Property Listings
New listings are up. In the active for-sale database, the pace moved from about 470 listings a day in March to about 760 in April, about 920 in the month before budget night and about 1,270 a day since 13 May.
Some of that is market movement. Some reflects the database getting broader through autumn. The volume is hard to read cleanly, but two signals are not a coverage artefact: whether a vendor publishes a price, and whether an existing listing gets cut.
Why More Sellers Are Choosing "Contact Agent"
When a campaign goes live without a public price, the vendor and agent are keeping room to test the market. That is normal at the top end and in some states, but the share moving in that direction has changed.
| Period | Share of new listings without a public price |
|---|---|
| March | about 22% |
| April | about 26% |
| Since budget night | about 36% |
| Most recent seven days | about 41% |
Vendors were already pulling back on public prices through April. Budget night accelerated it.
Weekly share of new listings going to market without a public asking price
Active listings currently in the database by week first seen; earlier weeks may understate the initial no-price rate as some listings have since been repriced. As at 1 June 2026.
By value band, the move is most obvious above the median:
| Value band | Pre-budget share without a price | Post-budget share without a price |
|---|---|---|
| Under $600k | about 9% | about 11% |
| $600k to $1.2m | about 21% | about 30% |
| $1.2m to $2m | about 35% | about 50% |
| $2m and above | about 50% | about 62% |
The largest shift is occurring in the $1.2m to $2m segment, where around half of post-Budget listings are now going to market without a public asking price.
Headline asking prices overstate the move
If you only look at median asking prices on new listings, the move looks sharp:
| Property type | Pre-budget median ask | Post-budget median ask | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| House | about $1.05m | about $949k | about -10% |
| Apartment | about $745k | about $699k | about -6% |
| Townhouse | about $908k | about $875k | about -4% |
That is not the same as saying vendors have cut new asking prices by 4% to 10%.
The mix changed. Fewer expensive listings came through after budget night, and more stock landed in the sub-$1.2m bands. That alone drags the headline median lower.
Inside the bands, the movement is smaller:
- Under $600k: broadly flat.
- $600k to $1.2m: down around 2%.
- $1.2m to $2m: down around 2% to 3%.
- $2m and above: down around 2%, but the sample is thin enough that it moves week to week.
New listings are a little less ambitious on price, but the headline median overstates the move. The larger shift is vendors skipping a public price altogether.
Existing vendors are cutting faster
New asking prices reflect what vendors hope to get. Once a listing has been tested and had no takers, the price change that follows shows what sellers will actually accept. Price cuts on existing listings provide a more direct read on how sellers are responding:
| Period | Vendor cuts per day |
|---|---|
| Month before budget night | about 130 |
| 13 May to 1 June | about 370 |
That is roughly a threefold increase from the pre-budget month.
Daily asking-price cuts on active listings
Genuine reductions where the revised price was below the prior price. Active and sold listings database combined; as at 1 June 2026.
The median cut is just under 4%. That is real money on a $900k listing, but not a distressed-sale number. The cuts are spread across sizes:
| Size of cut | Share of post-budget drops |
|---|---|
| Under 3% | about 35% |
| 3% to 5% | about 30% |
| 5% to 10% | about 27% |
| 10% or more | about 8% |
Most cuts are under 5%, but more than a third are 5% or larger, enough for a buyer tracking a suburb week to week to notice.
How each state is reacting
Across logged post-budget price-change events, the share that were cuts varies a lot by state:
| State | Share of logged price-change events that were cuts |
|---|---|
| TAS | about 76% |
| VIC | about 70% |
| ACT | about 52% |
| NT | about 51% |
| WA | about 37% |
| NSW | about 38% |
| SA | about 33% |
| QLD | about 23% |
Do not read that as "only 23% of Queensland reprices were cuts". It is the share of all logged price-change events, including listings that first moved from no price to a price. On true reprices, cuts dominate almost everywhere.
Queensland has the highest share of no-price listings in the dataset, which is why the cut-share looks low. Since budget night, about 57% of new Queensland listings have gone live without a public asking price. A vendor who never publishes a number never generates a visible cut.
The state listing flow is more useful alongside the no-price signal:
| State | Listings/day pre | Listings/day post | No-price share pre | No-price share post |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACT | about 22 | about 30 | about 16% | about 39% |
| NSW | about 224 | about 423 | about 41% | about 46% |
| NT | about 11 | about 8 | about 9% | about 20% |
| QLD | about 218 | about 253 | about 41% | about 57% |
| SA | about 38 | about 60 | about 27% | about 45% |
| TAS | about 9 | about 14 | about 8% | about 5% |
| VIC | about 286 | about 350 | about 2% | about 5% |
| WA | about 114 | about 128 | about 41% | about 44% |
NSW shows the clearest lift in new listing volume. Queensland's shift is away from public asking prices, with more than half of new post-budget listings there carrying no price. Victoria has the most visible cutting simply because Victorian listings are more likely to publish a guide in the first place.
The national headline masks three different patterns.
Sold prices are not ready yet
Reported sales are running below the prior month, but that is not a reliable Budget indicator yet. A property showing as sold now was usually negotiated weeks earlier, then settled later.
For post-budget contracts signed in late May and June, the sales data should start getting useful from late July. Until then, the listing data is useful but not conclusive.
What This Means for Buyers and Sellers
For buyers, the post-budget discount is not automatic. The better opportunities are in stock that listed before 12 May and has already been cut. Those vendors came to market in a different environment and are now adjusting to a changed buyer pool.
For vendors, a public asking price is now being benchmarked against a three-week run of cuts. Going to market without one will read differently to buyers than it did in March.
The data milestone to watch is late July, when post-budget contracts signed in late May and June should start settling and give a cleaner read on where prices actually landed.
To track this in a specific suburb, PropRadar covers active listings, sold prices, asking-versus-sold gaps and rental yield across most Australian postcodes. A day pass at $20 for 24 hours gives you full access.
Sources and method: policy details checked against Treasury's 2026-27 tax changes page and the Budget negative gearing and CGT explainer. Pre-budget signalling checked against ABC's 5 May report; budget-night details checked against ABC's 12 May report and a published budget-night explainer. Listing figures use PropRadar's active for-sale database and price-change history as at 1 June 2026; figures are rounded because coverage and listing status change daily.
Not sure where to invest? Take the 2-min quiz and we'll rank your top 10 suburbs.
Take the 2-min quizTurn market context into a shortlist
Compare live listings, suburb fundamentals, yield, cashflow and valuation signals before you inspect.