Skip to main content

Aberdare vs Lower Mangrove

Property investment comparison - Aberdare, NSW 2325 vs Lower Mangrove, NSW 2250

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdare wins 2, Lower Mangrove wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberdareLower Mangrove
Median house price$740K-
Median unit price$555K$610K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.07%3.17%
Gross rental yield (units)4.30%5.99%
1-year house growth+13.9%-
3-year house growth+32.4%-
Vacancy rate2.0%0.8%
Population2,54270

Aberdare vs Lower Mangrove: what the numbers say

For units, Aberdare sits at a median of $555K against $610K in Lower Mangrove, which makes Aberdare the more affordable unit market and Lower Mangrove the pricier one.

On cash flow, Aberdare leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.07%, compared with 3.17% in Lower Mangrove, a gap of 0.90 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Lower Mangrove and 2.0% in Aberdare, so landlords in Lower Mangrove face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aberdare is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,542 against 70, roughly 36 times the size of Lower Mangrove; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aberdare for rental income, Lower Mangrove for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison