Aberdare vs Mount Tomah
Property investment comparison - Aberdare, NSW 2325 vs Mount Tomah, NSW 2758
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdare wins 2, Mount Tomah wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aberdare | Mount Tomah |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $740K | - |
| Median unit price | $555K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.07% | 2.87% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.30% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +13.9% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +32.4% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.0% | 4.0% |
| Population | 2,542 | 68 |
Aberdare vs Mount Tomah: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Aberdare leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.07%, compared with 2.87% in Mount Tomah, a gap of 1.20 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 2.0% in Aberdare and 4.0% in Mount Tomah, so landlords in Aberdare face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Aberdare is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,542 against 68, roughly 37 times the size of Mount Tomah; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Aberdare for rental income, Aberdare for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison