Skip to main content

Boree vs Lavington

Property investment comparison - Boree, NSW 2325 vs Lavington, NSW 2641

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Boree wins 1, Lavington wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBoreeLavington
Median house price$630K$630K
Median unit price$465K$395K
Gross rental yield (houses)5.25%4.29%
Gross rental yield (units)5.09%5.25%
1-year house growth-+14.3%
3-year house growth-+33.4%
Vacancy rate2.0%1.6%
Population9313,073

Boree vs Lavington: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $630K in Boree and $630K in Lavington.

For units, Boree sits at a median of $465K against $395K in Lavington, which makes Lavington the more affordable unit market and Boree the pricier one.

On cash flow, Boree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.25%, compared with 4.29% in Lavington, a gap of 0.96 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Lavington and 2.0% in Boree, so landlords in Lavington face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Lavington is the bigger suburb, with a population of 13,073 against 93, roughly 141 times the size of Boree; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Boree for rental income, Lavington for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison