Boree vs Springdale Heights
Property investment comparison - Boree, NSW 2325 vs Springdale Heights, NSW 2641
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Boree wins 2, Springdale Heights wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Boree | Springdale Heights |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $630K | $630K |
| Median unit price | $465K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.25% | 4.10% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.09% | 5.20% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +13.5% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +9.5% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.0% | 2.3% |
| Population | 93 | 2,644 |
Boree vs Springdale Heights: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $630K in Boree and $630K in Springdale Heights.
On cash flow, Boree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.25%, compared with 4.10% in Springdale Heights, a gap of 1.15 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 2.0% in Boree and 2.3% in Springdale Heights, so landlords in Boree face less competition for tenants.
Springdale Heights is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,644 against 93, roughly 28 times the size of Boree; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Boree for rental income, Boree for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Springdale Heights, NSW 2641
Open Springdale Heights suburb profileRecent sales in Springdale Heights
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison