Skip to main content

Forrestdale vs Heathridge

Property investment comparison - Forrestdale, WA 6112 vs Heathridge, WA 6027

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Forrestdale wins 2, Heathridge wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricForrestdaleHeathridge
Median house price$970K$980K
Median unit price$510K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.90%4.04%
Gross rental yield (units)6.16%-
1-year house growth+20.9%estimate+20.1%
3-year house growth-+63.1%
Vacancy rate1.3%0.9%
Population1,0276,898

Forrestdale vs Heathridge: what the numbers say

The median house price is $970K in Forrestdale and $980K in Heathridge, so Forrestdale is the cheaper entry point, with Heathridge houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Heathridge leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.04%, compared with 3.90% in Forrestdale, a gap of 0.14 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +20.9% in Forrestdale (an estimate) and +20.1% in Heathridge, so recent momentum favours Forrestdale, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Heathridge and 1.3% in Forrestdale, so landlords in Heathridge face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Heathridge is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,898 against 1,027, roughly 7 times the size of Forrestdale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Heathridge for rental income, Forrestdale for a lower purchase price, Forrestdale for recent price momentum, Heathridge for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison