Narrandera vs Urbenville
Property investment comparison - Narrandera, NSW 2700 vs Urbenville, NSW 2475
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Narrandera wins 2, Urbenville wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Narrandera | Urbenville |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $410K | $410K |
| Median unit price | - | $400K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.33% | 4.87% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.00% | 2.40% |
| 1-year house growth | +10.2% | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.1% | 1.9% |
| Population | 4,369 | 331 |
Narrandera vs Urbenville: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $410K in Narrandera and $410K in Urbenville.
On cash flow, Narrandera leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.33%, compared with 4.87% in Urbenville, a gap of 0.46 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Urbenville and 2.1% in Narrandera, so landlords in Urbenville face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Narrandera is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,369 against 331, roughly 13 times the size of Urbenville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Narrandera for rental income, Urbenville for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison